: conduct further research to engage with the nuances of the case and to enforce your reasoning. Address the following points in your analysis: Your

: conduct further research to engage with the nuances of the case and to enforce your reasoning. Address the following points in your analysis: Your answer should be between This ongoing project submission will be graded according to the following rubric: No submission, or student fails to address any element of the brief.   (0) Some key   elements are not addressed. Most information provided is irrelevant. OR Answer does not fall within the prescribed word count (100 words over   word count). (5.5) Student has adhered to most of the brief. Sufficient information is   provided and is mostly relevant. (7) Student has adhered to almost all elements of the brief. Almost all   information is provided and is relevant. (8.5) Student has fully adhered to the brief. All information provided is   comprehensive and relevant. (10) No submission, or student fails to demonstrate even basic   understanding of how the threat actors relate (or do not relate) to the   organization’s sector. (0) Student shows an incomplete understanding of how the threat actors   relate (or do not relate) to the organization’s sector. (5.5) Student has adequately explained how (or why not) the threat actors   relate to the organization’s sector. However, at least one aspect is either   not completely correct or complete. Student has clearly justified how (or why not) the threat actors   relate to the organization’s sector. (8.5) Student has comprehensively and insightfully justified how (or why   not) the threat actors relate to the organization’s sector. (10) No submission, or student fails to demonstrate even basic   understanding of threats to the organization. (0) Student shows an incomplete understanding of threats to the   organization. Their justification of threat actors is incomplete, or lacks   logic or accuracy. (5.5) Student demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of threats to the   organization. Their justification of threat actors is adequate in its logic   and accuracy. However, at least one aspect is either not completely correct   or complete. (7) Student demonstrates a strong understanding of threats to the   organization. Their justification of threat actors is sound in its logic and   accuracy.  (8.5) Student demonstrates a masterful understanding of threats to the   organization. Their justification of threat actors is accurate, convincing,   and insightful. (10) No submission, or student fails to demonstrate even basic   understanding of methods of attack. (0) Student shows an incomplete understanding of their identified threat   actors’ methods of attack. Their justification of their methods of attack is   incomplete, or lacks logic or accuracy. (5.5) Student demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of their identified   threat actors’ methods of attack. Their justification of their methods of   attack is adequate in its logic and accuracy. However, at least one aspect is   either not completely correct or complete. (7) Student demonstrates a strong understanding of their identified threat   actors’ methods of attack. Their justification of their methods of attack is   sound in its logic and accuracy. (8.5) Student demonstrates a masterful understanding of their identified threat   actors’ methods of attack. Their justification of threat actors is accurate,   convincing, and insightful. (10) No submission, or complete lack of logical structure. (0) Answer has some logical structure, but not enough to justify a passing   grade. (5.5) Answer is structured fairly well in terms of logic and clarity. (7) Answer is structured very well in terms of logic and clarity. (8.5) Answer is structured exceptionally well in terms of logic and clarity.   (10) 50 points Purchase the answer to view it

Do you need us to help you on this or any other assignment?


Make an Order Now