Then choose two of the following three theories: Utilitarianism Kant’s Theory Ross’ Theory You may only choose from these three theories (if you choose utilitarianism, you can do either Act

Then choose two of the following three theories: Utilitarianism Kant’s Theory Ross’ Theory You may only choose from these three theories (if you choose utilitarianism, you can do either Act or Rule, BUT you CANNOT use Act utilitarianism as one theory and Rule utilitarianism as the other – only one theory of utilitarianism). If you choose a theory which is not on this list, then you will not get whatever points would have been associated with the theory on the scoring guide found under the general assignment description above. If you do all three for some reason, I will only score the first two according to the guide above. Once you have chosen your theories and case, then follow the guidelines above and write the paper. NOTE: You are doing moral analysis here – that means you need to argue for what should have been done.  YOU ARE NOT simply analyzing what was done, and saying which moral theory best fits that.  These aren’t sociology papers, they are ethics papers.  I want you to make an argument for what the morally right thing should have been.  If this is also what actually happened, then fine.  But the emphasis should be on the ethics, not the ) should get the job done, .  I Introduction: The paper has a clear introduction which explicitly identifies the case to be examined, the theories to be used, and definitely says which theory the paper will side with (10 points) Case Description: The paper has a concise and accurate description of the case, with a cited quote from the class text (20 points) Theory Descriptions: The paper has concise and accurate descriptions of the theories, with a cited quote from the class text to support the description of each theory (5 points each, 10 total) Theory Analyses: The paper makes fair and accurate analyses of how each moral theory would resolve the case (15 points each, 30 total) Argument: The paper makes a clear and definitive argument for one set of analyses over the other, free as possible of logical fallacies and other irrelevant biases (20 points) Style: The paper is written in a style appropriate for a humanities college class, which includes proper use of grammar, spelling, word choice, paragraph structure, etc.  All quotes are properly cited.  Previous style issues have been addressed.  (10 points)

Do you need us to help you on this or any other assignment?


Make an Order Now